Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443672›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2024

Eliminating gender bias in biomedical research requires fair inclusion of pregnant women and gender diverse people.

Mridula Shankar, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Annie McDougall, Manjunath S Somannavar, Sara Rushwan, Yeshita V Pujar, Umesh Charantimath, Anne Ammerdorffer and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mridula ShankarGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. mridula.shankar@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-6396
A Metin GülmezogluConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand.
Joshua P VogelWomen's, Children's and Adolescents' Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shivaprasad S GoudarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Annie McDougallWomen's, Children's and Adolescents' Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Manjunath S SomannavarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Sara RushwanConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand.
Yeshita V PujarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Umesh CharantimathWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Anne AmmerdorfferConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-061X
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic under-representation of pregnant women and gender diverse pregnant people in clinical research has prevented them from benefitting fairly from biomedical advances. The resulting lack of pharmacological safety and efficacy data leads to medicine discontinuation, sub-optimal dosing, and reliance on repurposed therapies. We identify four roadblocks to fair inclusion. First, investment and research are inhibited by protectionist attitudes among research gatekeepers who view pregnancy as a vulnerable state. Second, exclusion ignores human-specific biological variations affecting medication absorption and impacts on the pregnant body. Third, pregnant populations in low-and middle-income countries face a double disadvantage due to gender and location, despite bearing a disproportionate maternal mortality burden. Fourth, perspectives and experiences of pregnant populations are undervalued in clinical intervention design. We propose five actions to optimize fair inclusion: fostering reciprocal partnerships, prioritizing multi-disciplinary research, awareness-raising of the need for pharmaceutical innovation, conducting regulatory analyses, and promoting responsible inclusion over presumptive exclusion.

Identifiers

PMID39443672
PMCPMC11500090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.