Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443660›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Repeatability and reproducibility of artificial intelligence-acquired fetal brain measurements (SonoCNS) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

J Mlodawski, A Zmelonek-Znamirowska, M Mlodawska, K Detka, K Białek, G Swiercz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dangling Choroid Plexus: An Early Sign of Fetal Anomaly.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Heart Morphometry in Standard Second Trimester Scan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J MlodawskiJan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland. jakub.mlodawski@ujk.edu.pl.
A Zmelonek-ZnamirowskaJan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
M MlodawskaJan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
K DetkaProvincial Combined Hospital in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
K BiałekJan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
G SwierczJan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms are increasingly entering clinical practice, aiding in the assessment of fetal anatomy and biometry. One such tool for evaluating the fetal head and central nervous system structures is SonoCNS™, which delineates appropriate planes for measuring head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), transcerebellar diameter (TCD), width of the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle (Vp), and cisterna magna (CM) based on a 3D volume acquired at the level of the fetal head's thalamic plane. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability of measurements obtained using this software. The study included 381 patients, 270 in their second trimester of pregnancy (70%) and 111 in the third trimester. Each patient underwent manual biometric measurements of the aforementioned structures and twice using the SonoCNS software. We calculated the intraobserver variability between the manual measurements and the average of the automated measurements, as well as the interobserver variability for automated measurements. We also compared the median examination time for manual and automated measurements. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for interobserver and intraobserver variability for parameters BPD, HC, and OFD ranged from good to excellent reproducibility in the general population and subgroups (> 0.75). CM and Vp measurements, both in the general population and subgroups, fell into the category of moderate (0.5-0.75) and poor reproducibility (< 0.5). TCD measurements showed moderate (> 0.5) to good reproducibility (0.75-0.9), and OFD showed good and excellent reproducibility. The assessment of the biometry of fetal head structures using SonoCNS took an average of 63 s compared to 14 s for manual measurement (p < 0.001). The SonoCNS™ software is characterized by good to excellent reproducibility and repeatability in the measurement of fetal skull biometry (BPD, HC, and OFD), with poorer performance in measurements of intracranial structures (CM, Vp, TCD). Apart from biometric parameters, the software is useful in clinical practice for delineating appropriate planes from the acquired volume of the fetal head and shortening examination time.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrainPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, ThirdUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleFetusHumansObserver VariationPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID39443660
PMCPMC11500000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.