ArticleScientific reports2024
Repeatability and reproducibility of artificial intelligence-acquired fetal brain measurements (SonoCNS) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Performance of Transvaginal First-Trimester Anatomical Screening by Operators with Different Levels of Experience: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Morphology of the Genital Tubercle: A Macroscopic Assessment and Ultrasound Approach on Early Fetal Sex Determination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interobserver Agreement Between Artificial Intelligence, Radiologist, and Gynecologist in Hysterosalpingography Interpretation: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dangling Choroid Plexus: An Early Sign of Fetal Anomaly.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors and Predictive Models for Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Intrauterine Adhesions: A Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- SS_CASE_UNet: an attention-enhanced semi-supervised framework for fetal cerebellum segmentation in ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Heart Morphometry in Standard Second Trimester Scan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fully automated deep learning model for the evaluation of cavum septum pellucidum development in normal fetuses using magnetic resonance imaging: a Chinese cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Accuracy of ultrasonographic transcerebellar diameter for dating in third trimester of pregnancy in Nigerian women: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Transdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training integrates women's and children's health with life-course brain capital strategies: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms are increasingly entering clinical practice, aiding in the assessment of fetal anatomy and biometry. One such tool for evaluating the fetal head and central nervous system structures is SonoCNS™, which delineates appropriate planes for measuring head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), transcerebellar diameter (TCD), width of the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle (Vp), and cisterna magna (CM) based on a 3D volume acquired at the level of the fetal head's thalamic plane. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability of measurements obtained using this software. The study included 381 patients, 270 in their second trimester of pregnancy (70%) and 111 in the third trimester. Each patient underwent manual biometric measurements of the aforementioned structures and twice using the SonoCNS software. We calculated the intraobserver variability between the manual measurements and the average of the automated measurements, as well as the interobserver variability for automated measurements. We also compared the median examination time for manual and automated measurements. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for interobserver and intraobserver variability for parameters BPD, HC, and OFD ranged from good to excellent reproducibility in the general population and subgroups (> 0.75). CM and Vp measurements, both in the general population and subgroups, fell into the category of moderate (0.5-0.75) and poor reproducibility (< 0.5). TCD measurements showed moderate (> 0.5) to good reproducibility (0.75-0.9), and OFD showed good and excellent reproducibility. The assessment of the biometry of fetal head structures using SonoCNS took an average of 63 s compared to 14 s for manual measurement (p < 0.001). The SonoCNS™ software is characterized by good to excellent reproducibility and repeatability in the measurement of fetal skull biometry (BPD, HC, and OFD), with poorer performance in measurements of intracranial structures (CM, Vp, TCD). Apart from biometric parameters, the software is useful in clinical practice for delineating appropriate planes from the acquired volume of the fetal head and shortening examination time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.