Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443620›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

CRITID: enhancing CRITIC with advanced independence testing for robust multi-criteria decision-making.

Qiang Zhang, Jiahui Fan, Chaobang Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiang ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, China. zhangqiang@cdu.edu.cn.
Jiahui FanSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, China.
Chaobang GaoSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, China. kobren427@163.com.

Funding

Open Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Intelligent Information Processing, Institutions of Higher Education of Sichuan Province MSSB-2024-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multi-criteria decision-making and model evaluation, determining the weight of criteria is crucial. With the rapid development of information technology and the advent of the big data era, the need for complex problem analysis and decision-making has intensified. Traditional CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) methods rely on Pearson correlation, which may not adequately address nonlinearity in some scenarios. This study aims to refine the CRITIC method to better accommodate nonlinear relationships and enhance its robustness. We have developed a novel method named CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Dependence (CRITID), which leverages cutting-edge independence testing methods such as distance correlation among others. This approach enhances the assessment of intercriteria relationships. Upon application across diverse data distributions, the CRITID method has demonstrated enhanced rationality and robustness relative to the traditional CRITIC method. These improvements significantly benefit multi-criteria decision-making and model evaluation, providing a more accurate and dependable framework for analyzing complex datasets.

Indexed as

CRITICCRITIDIndependence testIndependence-zero equivalence property

Identifiers

PMID39443620
PMCPMC11499610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.