ArticleScientific reports2024
Response of growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of mulberry seedlings to waterlogging stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Potential of Mulberry and Its Resilience to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Root morphogenetic responses to waterlogging stress in plants: from structural reconfiguration to molecular regulatory mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Unveiling tolerance mechanisms in pepper to combined low-temperature and low-light stress: a physiological and transcriptomic approach.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in plant stress analysis using chlorophyllPhotosynthetica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the adaptive mechanisms of mulberry (Morus alba) to waterlogged conditions, with a specific focus on the development of adventitious roots (ARs), alteration of growth strategies, and adjustment of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. To achieve this goal, 4-year-old potted mulberry plants were selected for research, and a waterlogging simulation method was implemented. Four treatments were established to investigate the effects of varying water conditions on leaf waterlogging damage, the number of ARs, plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and proton motive force (pmf) parameters in mulberry plants. These treatments included the control group (CK), shallow submerged group (SS), half-submerged group (HS) and deep submerged group (DS). Our results showed that (1) The number of ARs in each group increased with increasing waterlogging time. (2) Waterlogging stress inhibited the height growth of mulberry, and the changes in plant height in the HS and DS groups were significantly lower than those in the CK and SS groups. (3) The maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm) in the HS and DS groups decreased significantly under waterlogging stress. The nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.