Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Improving maize yield and drought tolerance in field conditions through activated biochar application.

Muhammad Bilal Naeem, Summera Jahan, Audil Rashid, Anis Ali Shah, Vaseem Raja, Mohamed A El-Sheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative effect of gibberellic acid and brassinolide for mitigating drought stress in pea (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Bilal NaeemDepartment of Botany, Hafiz Hayat Campus, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Summera JahanDepartment of Botany, Hafiz Hayat Campus, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan. Summera.botany@pu.edu.pk.
Audil RashidDepartment of Botany, Hafiz Hayat Campus, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Anis Ali ShahDepartment of Botany, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan. anisalibot@gmail.com.
Vaseem RajaUniversity Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Mohamed A El-SheikhBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia RSP2024R182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst depleting water resources, rising crop water needs, changing climates, and soil fertility decline from inorganic modifications of soil, the need for sustainable agricultural solutions has been more pressing. The experimental work aimed to inspect the potential of organically activated biochar in improving soil physicochemical and nutrient status as well as improving biochemical and physiological processes, and optimizing yield-related attributes under optimal and deficit irrigation conditions. Biochar enhances soil structure, water retention, and nutrient availability, while improving plant nutrient uptake and drought resilience. The field experiment with maize crop was conducted in Hardaas Pur (32°38.37'N, 74°9.00'E), Gujrat, Pakistan. The experiment involved the use of DK-9108, DK-6321, and Sarhaab maize hybrid seeds, with five moisture levels of evapotranspiration (100% ETC, 80% ETC, 70% ETC, 60% ETC, and 50% ETC) maintained throughout the crop seasons. Furthermore, activated biochar was applied at three levels: 0 tons/ha (no biochar), 5 tons per hectare, and 10 tons per hectare. The study's findings revealed significant improvements in soil organic matter, bulk density, nutrient profile and total porosity with biochar supplementation in soil. Maize plants grown under lower levels of ETC in biochar supplemented soil had enhanced membrane stability index (1.6 times higher) increased protein content (1.4 times higher), reduced malondialdehyde levels (0.7 times lower), improved antioxidant enzyme activity (1.3 times more SOD and POD activity, and 1.2 times more CAT activity), improved relative growth (1.05 times more) and enhanced yield parameters (26% more grain and stover yield, 16% more 1000-seed weight, 29% more total seed weight, 33% more apparent water productivity) than control. Additionally, among the two biochar application levels tested, the 5 tons/ha dose demonstrated superior efficiency compared to the 10 tons/ha biochar dose.

Indexed as

CharcoalDroughtsSoilZea maysDrought ResistancePakistanWaterbiocharCharcoalSoilWaterCrop evapotranspirationDrought tolerancePenman-Monteith equationSoil healthWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39443551
PMCPMC11499918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.