Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443542›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

STM-based symbolic regression for strength prediction of RC deep beams and corbels.

Khaled Megahed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khaled MegahedDepartment of Structural Engineering, Mansoura University, PO BOX 35516, Mansoura, Egypt. k.megahed@mans.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-1142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study uses symbolic regression with a strut-and-tie model to predict the shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams (RCDBs) and corbels (RCCs). Previous studies have proposed two distinct types of models for estimating shear capacity: explainable models based on theoretical derivations and black-box models derived from machine learning (ML) methods. This study proposes a hybrid model derived from the strut-and-tie model (STM), where the performance of STM is enhanced through the ML approach using genetic programming. This model is based on a comprehensive experimental database of 810 tests for the shear strength of RC deep beams and 371 tests for RC corbels from various research papers. The developed STM-based symbolic regression (SR-STM) integrates two distinct force-transferring mechanisms: the diagonal strut mechanism utilizing concrete strength and the truss mechanism utilizing orthogonal web reinforcement. The SR-STM model is both robust and interpretable, demonstrating high prediction accuracy with mean values of the prediction-to-actual ratios of 0.999 and 1.004 and coefficient of determination values of 0.913 and 0.862 for RCDBs and RCCs, respectively, while providing explainable mathematical expressions that align with the mechanical principles of STM. The developed SR-STM model is benchmarked against several state-of-the-art models and evaluated against the CatBoost ML technique, demonstrating acceptable performance. The results highlight the SR-STM model's effectiveness in providing reliable predictions and valuable insights for practical engineering applications. Furthermore, a SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis was performed, and its results align with the SR-STM model, confirming the model's effectiveness in accurately capturing the key factors influencing the shear strength of RCDBs and RCCs.

Indexed as

CatBoost modelCorbelsDeep beamsMachine learningStrut-and-tie modelSymbolic regression

Identifiers

PMID39443542
PMCPMC11499994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.