ArticleScientific reports2024
Survivor detection approach for post earthquake search and rescue missions based on deep learning inspired algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enhanced Thermal-Visual-Inertial Odometry and Autonomous Planning for GPS-Denied Search-and- Rescue Robotics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Speed, Maneuverable, and Terrain-Adaptive Micro-Robot with Tree Frog-Inspired Bionic Feet.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and reliable detection of human survivors trapped under debris is crucial for effective post-earthquake search and rescue (SAR) operations. This paper presents a novel approach to survivor detection using a snake robot equipped with deep learning (DL) based object identification algorithms. We evaluated the performance of three main algorithms: Faster R-CNN, Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), and You Only Look Once (YOLO). While these algorithms are initially trained on the PASCAL VOC 2012 dataset for human identification, we address the lack of a dedicated dataset for trapped individuals by compiling a new dataset of 200 images that specifically depicts this scenario, featuring cluttered environment and occlusion. Our evaluation takes into account detection accuracy, confidence interval, and running time. The results demonstrate that the YOLOv10 algorithm achieves the 98.4 mAP@0.5, accuracy of 98.5% for inference time of 15 ms. We validate the performance of these algorithms using images of human survivors trapped under debris and subjected to various occlusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.