ArticleScientific reports2024
Safety and efficacy of using stapler device for wide cystic duct ligation in acute setting of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of laparoscopic manual suturing and laparoscopic stapler usage for gallbladder duodenal fistula stoma closure.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a radiologically-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research explores the challenges posed by variations in cystic duct anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the potential use of stapler devices to address such complexities. It aims to assess the safety and efficacy of stapler devices, particularly in cases involving short, and wide cystic duct. The study, conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2021 and 2023. The study design involved a retrospective cohort approach, and the sample size encompassed all cases meeting the inclusion criteria during the study period. Data was analyzed using SPSS program. The study involving 568 patients, with the predominant technique for ligation being clipping (89.3%). The primary indication for using the Endo GIA stapler was a wide cystic duct (6.2%). Analysis revealed a significant association between stapler device use and hypertension (p = 0.042), diabetes (p = 0.001), CKD (p = 0.011), and obstructive jaundice (p = 0.006). Multivariate regression demonstrated that older patients were 2.1 times more likely to use stapler devices (AOR = 2.125; p = 0.039), while those with obstructive jaundice had a 2.2 times higher likelihood (AOR = 2.168; p = 0.049). Throughout the years, metal clips have shown the best prognosis compared to any other method for securing the cystic duct during closure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, to avoid incomplete sealing of wide, short, or inflamed ducts, other instruments have emerged as possible alternatives for such conditions. Use of Endo-GIA is a safe and effective method for patients with wide, short cystic duct. Selective usage of endo-GIA is considered cost effective and may add a positive impact in decreasing post operative biliary leak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.