ArticleNature communications2024
Direct cleavage of C=O double bond in CO
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Molybdenum-Based Catalysts for the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Selective and autonomous generation of singlet oxygen for synergistic heavy metal-organic removal without energy input.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Strained Ni-WC nano-islands by localized accelerated carbonization emulate noble-metal RWGS activity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Breaking activity-selectivity-stability trade-offs in reverse water-gas shift reaction via high-energy micro-faceted MoNature communications · 2026Article
- Thermophilic MoNCommunications chemistry · 2025Article
- Controlled synthesis of two-dimensional porous molybdenum nitrideRSC advances · 2025Article
- Encompassing Synthetic Methods to Modification Strategies: Cu-MOF-Derived Electrocatalysts for Enhancing COTopics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to H
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.