Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2025
Total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrograde ureteral catheterization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be omitted in selected patients: a randomized controlled trial.Urolithiasis · 2026Trial
- Safety and feasibility of tubeless PCNL without urinary catheter or retrograde intubation under paravertebral block.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of stone-free status in patients undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Impact of hydronephrosis grade on surgical parameters and stone-free rates in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective multivariable study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of the effects of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteral impacted stones with infection.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis.
methodsThis prospective randomized controlled study at a tertiary care medical center was conducted from August 2019 to April 2023. Kidney stone patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) without significant hydronephrosis were randomly assigned to two groups: total tubeless PCNL without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter (group 1) and traditional PCNL (group 2). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications, while the secondary endpoints included the stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical costs.
resultsA total of 99 patients were recruited, including 50 patients in group 1 and 49 patients in group 2. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and SFR between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, relative to group 2, patients in group 1 had significantly shorter operative time (58.5 ± 25.39 min vs. 82.98 ± 26.02 min, P < 0.001) and length of postoperative hospital stay (1.98 ± 1.72 days vs. 4.39 ± 2.95 days, P < 0.001), as well as significantly lower medical costs (3190.30 ± 590.58 dollars vs. 3552.78 ± 967.79 dollars, P = 0.03).
conclusionTotal tubeless PCNL without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis is safe and effective for urologists with extensive experience in PCNL.
trial registrationchictr.org.cn identifier, ChiCTR2000040884, date of registration: 13/12/2020, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39443433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.