Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443388›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Smartphone-based thermal imaging for pedicled skin flaps: a pilot study toward objective perfusion assessment in facial, head, and neck reconstruction.

Lukas Sebastian Fiedler, Meyer Tobias, Lippert M Burkard, Adrian Lukas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas Sebastian FiedlerDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck, Plastic Surgery, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Am Gesundbrunnen 20-26, 74078, Heilbronn, Germany. l.fiedler@gmx.at.
Meyer TobiasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Lippert M BurkardDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck, Plastic Surgery, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Am Gesundbrunnen 20-26, 74078, Heilbronn, Germany.
Adrian LukasDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck, Plastic Surgery, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Am Gesundbrunnen 20-26, 74078, Heilbronn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to develop a practical algorithm for utilizing smartphone-based thermal imaging (SBTI) in the perioperative setting and to establish a standardized evaluation method for objectively assessing SBTI images for cutaneous perfusion of pedicled flaps in the face, head, and neck.

methodsThis prospective conducted study, integrated SBTI into the assessment of 16 patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for face and neck defects. Thermal images were captured at four timepoints: after marking (T1), after flap elevation (T2), upon completion of surgery (T3), and 24 h postoperatively (T4). The flap areas were divided into three flap zones and graded based on temperature differences (ΔT), with a grading system where grade 1 indicated perfect perfusion and grades 2 to 5 indicated increasing perfusion impairment.

results6 male and 10 female patients aged 64-93 years (mean 78.5 years) undergoing reconstructive pedicled skin flap surgery for facial and neck defects (1 × 1 cm to 11 × 8 cm) due to diagnoses of malignant cutaneous lesions were investigated. Intraoperative assessments indicated good perfusion across flaps. One postoperative dehiscence occurred in an 83-year-old male with a cervical advancement flap, correlated with a significant temperature difference (ΔT > 4 °C) intraoperatively. Statistical analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (p = 0.0003) between clinical assessment grades and ΔT values between specific flap zones at T3.

conclusionSBTI is an easy-to-apply, low-cost, real-time and reproducible technique for indirect perfusion assessment in pedicled skin flaps of the head and neck region. Further studies are needed implementing this methodology in large and free flaps.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresSmartphoneSurgical FlapsThermographyAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesObjectivePedicled flapsPerfusionSkin flapsSmartphone diagnosticsThermal imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.