ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Leveraging the potential of 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolomics.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exogenous indole promotes florfenicol tolerance inVirulence · 2026Article
- Quantification of Endogenous Steroids and Hormonal Contraceptives in Human Plasma via Surrogate Calibration and UHPLC-MS/MS.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Untargeted metabolomics UHPLC-HRMS workflows typically employ narrowbore 2.1-mm inner diameter (i.d.) columns. However, the wide concentration range of the metabolome and the need to often analyze small sample amounts poses challenges to these approaches. Reducing the column diameter could be a potential solution. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a microbore 1.0-mm i.d. setup compared to the 2.1-mm i.d. benchmark for untargeted metabolomics. The 1.0-mm i.d. setup was implemented on a micro-UHPLC system, while the 2.1-mm i.d. on a standard UHPLC, both coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap HRMS. On polar standard metabolites, a sensitivity gain with an average 3.8-fold increase over the 2.1-mm i.d., along with lower LOD (LOD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.