ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024
Real-world Data of Antithrombotic Therapy in Neuroendovascular Therapy: Analysis of JR-NET 4.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the number of neuroendovascular therapies in Japan increases, the current trends in periprocedural antithrombotic therapy must be understood.We retrospectively analyzed data on periprocedural antithrombotic therapy in the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4, a nationwide survey carried out in Japan between January 2015 and December 2019. Details on antithrombotic therapy in neuroendovascular therapy for ruptured cerebral aneurysms, unruptured cerebral aneurysms, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting were collected from the JR-NET 4 database. These data were analyzed and compared with those from the JR-NET 2 (January 2008 to December 2009) and JR-NET 3 (January 2010 to December 2014). A total of 36,560 cases were analyzed in the JR-NET 4. The frequency of preprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) significantly increased from the JR-NET 2 to 4 (48.1%, 53.4%, and 62.3%, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas the frequency of monotherapy significantly decreased (15.7%, 13.9%, and 8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Postprocedural antiplatelet therapy exhibited similar trends, and postprocedural anticoagulant therapy was discontinued. Particularly, heparin use significantly decreased from the JR-NET 2 to 4 (23.4% vs. 12.7% vs. 7.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). In terms of periprocedural complications, the incidence of ischemic complications increased from the JR-NET 3 to 4 (5.8% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.05). In the JR-NET 4, severe adverse events and hemorrhagic and all complications were significantly more frequent in the preprocedural triple or more therapy group.The rate of postprocedural anticoagulant therapy decreased, whereas that of antiplatelet therapy increased. Overall, in Japan, periprocedural DAPT has become increasingly common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.