Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443063›Full record

ReviewBehavior therapy2024

State of the Science: Written Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Denise M Sloan, Brian P Marx

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denise M SloanNational Center for PTSD at VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine. Electronic address: denise.sloan@va.gov.
Brian P MarxNational Center for PTSD at VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine.

Funding

Written Exposure Therapy for PTSD: A Randomized Noninferiority TrialR01MH095737 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SLOAN, DENISE M. · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
Examining Written Disclosure as an Intervention for PTSDR34MH077658 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SLOAN, DENISE M. · 2008 to 2009
$441k
An efficient, exposure-based treatment for PTSD compared to Prolonged Exposure: A non-inferiority randomized trialI01CX001967 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI SLOAN, DENISE M. · 2019 to 2024
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001967NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095737NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH077658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are effective psychotherapies available for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), brief treatments for PTSD are needed to expand the reach of treatment. Written exposure therapy (WET) is a brief treatment that has the potential to fill an important need in PTSD treatment and has a rapidly expanding evidence base to support its use. In this paper we provide information on how WET was developed, and we present proposed underlying mechanisms of the treatment and evidence supporting the underlying mechanism. The current evidence supporting WET for the treatment of PTSD is reviewed. The evidence indicates that WET is an efficacious and effective treatment approach for PTSD and is noninferior to more time-intensive evidence-based treatments for PTSD. The paper concludes with suggestions for expanding the evidence base of WET that is necessary for it to be considered a first-line treatment approach across clinical practice guidelines.

Indexed as

Implosive TherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansTreatment Outcomeexposure treatmentPTSDrandomized controlled trialwritten exposure therapy

Identifiers

PMID39443063
PMCPMC11700379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.