Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443059›Full record

ReviewBehavior therapy2024

The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: State of the Science.

Morgan Robison, Nikhila S Udupa, Tyler B Rice, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Thomas E Joiner, Megan L Rogers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding suicidality among sexual and gender minority youth: Applying the interpersonal psychological theory of suicide.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Morgan RobisonFlorida State University. Electronic address: mrobison@psy.fsu.edu.
Nikhila S UdupaFlorida State University.
Tyler B RiceFlorida State University.
Emma Wilson-LemoineKing's College London.
Thomas E JoinerFlorida State University.
Megan L RogersTexas State University.

Funding

Integrated Clinical Neuroscience Training for Translational ResearchT32MH093311 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA A ECKEL, Pamela K. Keel · 2012 to 2026
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this state-of-the-science review, we summarize the key constructs and concepts within the interpersonal theory of suicide. The state of the scientific evidence regarding the theory is equivocal, and we explore the reasons for and some consequences of that equivocal state. Our particular philosophy of science includes criteria such as explanatory reach and pragmatic utility, among others, in addition to the important criterion of predictive validity. Across criteria, the interpersonal theory fares reasonably well, but it is also true that it struggles somewhat-as does every other theory of suicidality-with stringent versions of predictive validity. We explore in some depth the implications of the theory and its status regarding people who are minoritized. Some implications and future directions for research are also presented.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPsychological TheorySuicideHumansSuicidal Ideationempirical statusinterpersonal theory of suicidephilosophy of science

Identifiers

PMID39443059
PMCPMC11632606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.