ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2024
RNA fold prediction by Monte Carlo in graph space and the statistical mechanics of tertiary interactions.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a graph representation of RNA structures, we have studied the ensembles of secondary and tertiary graphs of two sets of RNA with Monte Carlo simulations. The first consisted of 91 target ribozyme and riboswitch sequences of moderate lengths (<150 nt) having a variety of secondary, H-type pseudoknots and kissing loop interactions. The second set consisted of 71 more diverse sequences across many RNA families. Using a simple empirical energy model for tertiary interactions and only sequence information for each target as input, the simulations examined how tertiary interactions impact the statistical mechanics of the fold ensembles. The results show that the graphs proliferate enormously when tertiary interactions are possible, producing an entropic driving force for the ensemble to access folds having tertiary structures even though they are overall energetically unfavorable in the energy model. For each of the targets in the two test sets, we assessed the quality of the model and the simulations by examining how well the simulated structures were able to predict the native fold, and compared the results to fold predictions from ViennaRNA. Our model generated good or excellent predictions in a large majority of the targets. Overall, this method was able to produce predictions of comparable quality to Vienna, but it outperformed Vienna for structures with H-type pseudoknots. The results suggest that while tertiary interactions are predicated on real-space contacts, their impacts on the folded structure of RNA can be captured by graph space information for sequences of moderate lengths, using a simple tertiary energy model for the loops, the base pairs, and base stacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.