Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441994›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Taeniasis impacts human gut microbiome composition and function.

Wenjie Mu, Pingping Ma, Yugui Wang, Yaqi Li, Yingying Ding, Yang Zou, Lixia Pu, Qi Yan, Haoyue Kong, Xiaola Guo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ISME communications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wenjie MuState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Pingping MaState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Yugui WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Yaqi LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Yingying DingState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Yang ZouState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Lixia PuState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Qi YanState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Haoyue KongState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Xiaola GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Aijiang GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
Hailong LiDepartment of Parasitology, College of Basic Medicine, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671000, China.
Shuai WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, College of Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.

Funding

Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation 23JRRA1514Major Science and Technology Project 23ZDNA007National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human taeniasis, caused by Taenia tapeworms, is a global parasitic disease with significant implications for public health and food safety. These tapeworms can grow to considerable sizes and potentially impact the microecology of the host gut. Despite their importance, the effects of Taenia infection on host gut microbiota haven't been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the gut microbiome in patients infected with Taenia asiatica (n = 87) compared to healthy controls (n = 79) in the Dali cohort, China. We also performed a longitudinal assessment of microbial changes following deworming in a subset of patients (n = 24). Our findings reveal a significant shift in gut microbial composition, characterized by increased alpha-diversity and an enrichment of Prevotella-driven enterotypes in infected patients compared to healthy controls. The stability of these microbial features post-deworming varied widely among individuals and was lower in those with lower initial alpha diversity and Prevotella-enterotype before deworming. We observed a significant depletion of Bifidobacterium species in infected individuals, regardless of enterotypes, and these prebiotics did not recover post-deworming. Metabolic network analysis and in vitro experiments suggest that the reduction of Bifidobacterium was linked to metabolic competition for ecological niches or nutrients, particularly stachyose, from other microbes rather than the parasitism itself. Furthermore, our machine learning analysis demonstrated that taxa associated with Bifidobacterium in stachyose metabolism could robustly predict infection but could not predict deworming. This study highlights the substantial impact of taeniasis on the human gut microbiome and overall gut health.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeTaeniasisAdultAnimalsBacteriaBifidobacteriumChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevotellaTaeniaBifidobacteriumgut microbiomestachyose metabolismtapeworm

Identifiers

PMID39441994
PMCPMC11536184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.