ArticleThe ISME journal2024
Taeniasis impacts human gut microbiome composition and function.
Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiome Health in Farm Animals and Fish: Implications for Human Health and the Risk of Gastrointestinal Diseases.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Helminth reshapes host gut microbiota and immunoregulation by deploying an antimicrobial program of innate immunity.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Stachyose attenuates DSS-induced colitis and is associated with elevated colonic medium-chain fatty acids: an integrated multi-omics analysis.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Host Genetic Effects and Phenotypic Landscapes of Rumen Bacterial Enterotypes in a Large Sheep Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Whipworm infection remodels the gut microbiome ecosystem and compromises intestinal homeostasis in elderly patients revealed by multi-omics analyses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human taeniasis, caused by Taenia tapeworms, is a global parasitic disease with significant implications for public health and food safety. These tapeworms can grow to considerable sizes and potentially impact the microecology of the host gut. Despite their importance, the effects of Taenia infection on host gut microbiota haven't been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the gut microbiome in patients infected with Taenia asiatica (n = 87) compared to healthy controls (n = 79) in the Dali cohort, China. We also performed a longitudinal assessment of microbial changes following deworming in a subset of patients (n = 24). Our findings reveal a significant shift in gut microbial composition, characterized by increased alpha-diversity and an enrichment of Prevotella-driven enterotypes in infected patients compared to healthy controls. The stability of these microbial features post-deworming varied widely among individuals and was lower in those with lower initial alpha diversity and Prevotella-enterotype before deworming. We observed a significant depletion of Bifidobacterium species in infected individuals, regardless of enterotypes, and these prebiotics did not recover post-deworming. Metabolic network analysis and in vitro experiments suggest that the reduction of Bifidobacterium was linked to metabolic competition for ecological niches or nutrients, particularly stachyose, from other microbes rather than the parasitism itself. Furthermore, our machine learning analysis demonstrated that taxa associated with Bifidobacterium in stachyose metabolism could robustly predict infection but could not predict deworming. This study highlights the substantial impact of taeniasis on the human gut microbiome and overall gut health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.