ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2024
Short- and long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest: a nationwide cohort study 2013-22.
Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring During Postresuscitation Care After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Scoping Review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiopulmonary Function in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction with and without Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Anxiety disorders following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: A comprehensive review of clinical manifestations and interventions.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess short- and long-term outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in a nationwide cohort. METHODS AND
resultsCohort study of AMI patients admitted to hospitals in Norway 2013-22 registered in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Registry. Outcomes were in-hospital and long-term mortality. Cumulative mortality was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier and the life-table methods. Cox regression was used for risk comparisons. Among 105 439 AMI patients (35% women), we identified 3638 (3.5%) patients with OHCA and 2559 (2.4%) with IHCA. The mean age was 65.7 (13.2), 70.9 (12.6), and 70.7 (13.6) years for OHCA, IHCA, and AMI without cardiac arrest (CA), respectively. The median follow-up time was 3.3 (25th, 75th percentile: 1.1, 6.3) years. In-hospital mortality was 28, 49, and 5%, in OHCA, IHCA, and AMI without CA, and the estimated 5-year cumulative mortality was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-50%], 69% (95% CI 67-71%), and 35% (95% CI 34-35%), respectively. Among patients surviving to hospital discharge, no significant difference in mortality during follow-up was found between OHCA and AMI without CA [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13], while the long-term mortality of AMI patients with IHCA was higher (age-adjusted HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.45).
conclusionIn this large, contemporary cohort of AMI patients, in-hospital mortality of patients with OHCA or IHCA was still high. Among patients surviving to hospital discharge, long-term mortality was comparable between OHCA and AMI without CA, while the outcome of patients with IHCA was significantly worse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.