Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441931›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Youths' sensitivity to social media feedback: A computational account.

Ana da Silva Pinho, Violeta Céspedes Izquierdo, Björn Lindström, Wouter van den Bos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural and psychological predictors of digital status-seeking in adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana da Silva PinhoDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-589X
Violeta Céspedes IzquierdoDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0983-4170
Björn LindströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wouter van den BosDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-3790

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is often argued that continuous exposure to social feedback is specifically challenging for the hypersensitive developing brain, empirical evidence is lacking. Across three studies, we reveal the developmental differences and computational mechanisms that underlie the social media engagement and feedback processing of adolescents and adults. First, using a reinforcement learning model on a large Instagram trace dataset (

Indexed as

Social MediaAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39441931
PMCPMC11498218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.