Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441928›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Historical insights at scale: A corpus-wide machine learning analysis of early modern astronomic tables.

Oliver Eberle, Jochen Büttner, Hassan El-Hajj, Grégoire Montavon, Klaus-Robert Müller, Matteo Valleriani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver EberleMachine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6967-9950
Jochen BüttnerBIFOLD-Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1758-3153
Hassan El-HajjBIFOLD-Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6931-7709
Grégoire MontavonMachine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Klaus-Robert MüllerMachine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-7685
Matteo VallerianiBIFOLD-Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-7777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolution and dissemination of human knowledge over time faces challenges due to the abundance of historical materials and limited specialist resources. However, the digitization of historical archives presents an opportunity for AI-supported analysis. This study advances historical analysis by using an atomization-recomposition method that relies on unsupervised machine learning and explainable AI techniques. Focusing on the "Sacrobosco Collection," consisting of 359 early modern printed editions of astronomy textbooks from European universities (1472-1650), totaling 76,000 pages, our analysis uncovers temporal and geographic patterns in knowledge transformation. We highlight the relevant role of astronomy textbooks in shaping a unified mathematical culture, driven by competition among educational institutions and market dynamics. This approach deepens our understanding by grounding insights in historical context, integrating with traditional methodologies. Case studies illustrate how communities embraced scientific advancements, reshaping astronomic and geographical views and exploring scientific roots amidst a changing world.

Identifiers

PMID39441928
PMCPMC11498222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.