Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441920›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Contrastive signal-dependent plasticity: Self-supervised learning in spiking neural circuits.

Alexander G Ororbia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander G OrorbiaDepartment of Computer Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Dr, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-1310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-inspired machine intelligence research seeks to develop computational models that emulate the information processing and adaptability that distinguishes biological systems of neurons. This has led to the development of spiking neural networks, a class of models that promisingly addresses the biological implausibility and the lack of energy efficiency inherent to modern-day deep neural networks. In this work, we address the challenge of designing neurobiologically motivated schemes for adjusting the synapses of spiking networks and propose contrastive signal-dependent plasticity, a process which generalizes ideas behind self-supervised learning to facilitate local adaptation in architectures of event-based neuronal layers that operate in parallel. Our experimental simulations demonstrate a consistent advantage over other biologically plausible approaches when training recurrent spiking networks, crucially side-stepping the need for extra structure such as feedback synapses.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetSupervised Machine LearningSynapses

Identifiers

PMID39441920
PMCPMC11639678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.