Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Changes in systems thinking and health equity considerations across four communities participating in Catalyzing Communities.

Travis R Moore, Larissa Calancie, Erin Hennessy, Julie Appel, Christina D Economos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Travis R MooreChildObesity180, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-0813
Larissa CalancieChildObesity180, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Erin HennessyChildObesity180, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Julie AppelChildObesity180, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Christina D EconomosChildObesity180, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood obesity is a persistent public health concern, and community-based interventions have become crucial for addressing it by engaging local communities and implementing comprehensive evidence-based strategies. The Catalyzing Communities intervention takes a "whole-of-community"approach to involve leaders from diverse sectors in thinking systematically about child healthy weights and implementing evidence-based solutions. Using systems thinking and the Getting to Equity framework to guide interview analysis, this study examines changes in participants' use of systems thinking concepts and health equity in 43 participants across four U.S. communities involved in the Catalyzing Communities intervention. Our findings reveal significant shifts in systems thinking concepts, as participants develop a deeper understanding of childhood obesity as a complex adaptive system, and system insights, as participants increasingly recognize the interconnections and leverage points within the system driving childhood obesity. Participants also experienced increases in health equity thinking and action, particularly when discussing social and structural determinants of health, commitment to targeted actions, and a focus on addressing barriers and enhancing resources. The intersection between systems insights and health equity action, such as explaining leverage points and interventions to reduce deterrents to health behaviors, suggests the need for systems thinking activities to be integrated into health equity planning. Future research is needed to develop measures to connect systems thinking concepts to health equity, and the impact of these to community-level policy, systems, and environmental changes in public health.

Indexed as

Health EquityPediatric ObesitySystems AnalysisAdultChildCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39441877
PMCPMC11498710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.