Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Moving towards a core measures set for patient safety in perioperative care: An e-Delphi consensus study.

J P Dinis-Teixeira, Ana Beatriz Nunes, Andreia Leite, Willemijn L A Schäfer, Claudia Valli, Ismael Martínez-Nicolas, Ayshe Seyfulayeva, Pedro Casaca Carvalho, Anna Rodríguez, Daniel Arnal-Velasco and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J P Dinis-TeixeiraNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-2105
Ana Beatriz NunesNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Andreia LeiteNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Willemijn L A SchäferDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research & Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Claudia ValliAvedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-3690
Ismael Martínez-NicolasSpanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-3741
Ayshe SeyfulayevaNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro Casaca CarvalhoNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9772-806X
Anna RodríguezAvedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel Arnal-VelascoSpanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-4472
Irene LeonSpanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain.
Carola OrregoAvedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Paulo SousaNational School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
SAFEST Consortium and the SAFEST Scientific Advisory Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Core Measures Set (CMS) is an agreed standardized group of measures that should be assessed and reported in research for a specific condition or clinical area. This study undertook the development of a CMS for Patient Safety through a two-round, web-based Delphi consensus approach, in the context of the "Improving quality and patient SAFEty in surgical care through STandardisation and harmonization of perioperative care in Europe" (SAFEST) project-a collaborative, patient-centered and evidence-based European Union-funded project that aims to generate action-oriented evidence in perioperative care. We developed an Initial List of Measures via an umbrella review following the deployment of an e-Delphi method with an inclusive panel of experts to prioritize measures towards a consensualized Final List of Measures. All measures were rigorously assessed for both importance and feasibility. After the two rounds of the e-Delphi consensus method we observed 13 preoperative measures (40.6% of the initial number), 24 intraoperative measures (66.7%), 25 postoperative measures (20.3%) and 23 mixed period measures (41.1%) met consensus criteria for both importance and feasibility. Higher scores were detected in importance ratings compared to feasibility across all groups of measures. Importantly, numeric averages regarding pain-related measures differed in the assessment of patients when compared to that of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). This work not only informs future SAFEST iterations but also sets a precedent for research into valid, patient-centered, and action-oriented perioperative safety measures.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniquePatient SafetyPerioperative CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID39441853
PMCPMC11498713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.