ArticlePLoS genetics2024
A comprehensive framework for trans-ancestry pathway analysis using GWAS summary data from diverse populations.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cross-ancestry analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus identifies novel loci, drug targets and biological pathways.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Cross-ancestry genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility genes for preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As more multi-ancestry GWAS summary data become available, we have developed a comprehensive trans-ancestry pathway analysis framework that effectively utilizes this diverse genetic information. Within this framework, we evaluated various strategies for integrating genetic data at different levels-SNP, gene, and pathway-from multiple ancestry groups. Through extensive simulation studies, we have identified robust strategies that demonstrate superior performance across diverse scenarios. Applying these methods, we analyzed 6,970 pathways for their association with schizophrenia, incorporating data from African, East Asian, and European populations. Our analysis identified over 200 pathways significantly associated with schizophrenia, even after excluding genes near genome-wide significant loci. This approach substantially enhances detection efficiency compared to traditional single-ancestry pathway analysis and the conventional approach that amalgamates single-ancestry pathway analysis results across different ancestry groups. Our framework provides a flexible and effective tool for leveraging the expanding pool of multi-ancestry GWAS summary data, thereby improving our ability to identify biologically relevant pathways that contribute to disease susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.