Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441661›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2024

"Phones off while school's on": Evaluating problematic phone use and the social, wellbeing, and academic effects of banning phones in schools.

Daniel L King, Marcela Radunz, Christina R Galanis, Blake Quinney, Tracey Wade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel L KingCollege of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-2581
Marcela RadunzCollege of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-0313
Christina R GalanisCollege of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9612-4192
Blake QuinneyCollege of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2899-2510
Tracey WadeCollege of Education, Psychology & Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-770X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Mobile phone bans in secondary schools are claimed to reduce student distraction and promote learning and face-to-face socializing. Currently, the evidence on phone bans is limited. The aim of this preregistered study was to evaluate the South Australian mobile phone ban's effects on students' problematic phone use, academic engagement, school belonging, and bullying. The study also sought to identify student variables that predict phone ban compliance. Methods: As the ban was phased in over 2023, a 2 (phone ban: yes/no) × 2 (time: baseline, 1-month follow-up) repeated-measures design was employed. Students (n = 1,282 at baseline; n = 1,256 at follow-up) in Grades 7 to 12 were recruited from five public secondary schools. Surveys included measures drawn from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Results: Problematic phone use was reported by 2.6% of the sample. Being older and a more frequent user of social media predicted lower phone ban compliance. Linear mixed models indicated that ban and no ban school groups did not differ significantly in terms of problematic phone use, academic engagement, and school belonging. There was slightly higher bullying in the ban group but bullying decreased significantly in both groups. Discussion: Imposing access restrictions may not affect the underlying psychological mechanisms that drive problematic phone use. Although these results indicate limited to no short-term benefits of the ban, further evaluation with more sensitive methodologies is recommended. Conclusions: Student-technology interactions in learning institutions should be continually monitored to determine the optimal balance to support student etiquette, learning, and wellbeing.

Indexed as

BullyingCell PhoneSchoolsStudentsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSouth Australiaadolescentbanmobile phoneproblematic useschoolsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID39441661
PMCPMC11737419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.