Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441595›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Long-Term Outcomes of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-PET Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Natalia Kunst, Jessica B Long, Sarah Westvold, Preston C Sprenkle, Isaac Y Kim, Lawrence Saperstein, Maximilian Rabil, Umar Ghaffar, R Jeffrey Karnes, Xiaomei Ma and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Assessing Value for Money in Theranostic Nuclear Medicine: A Systematic Review.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  7. PSMA-Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: from diagnosis to risk & quality of life.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natalia KunstCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Jessica B LongCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Sarah WestvoldCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Preston C SprenkleDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Isaac Y KimDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lawrence SapersteinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Maximilian RabilDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Umar GhaffarDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Xiaomei MaCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cary P GrossCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Shi-Yi WangCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael S LeapmanCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Optimizing prostate cancer care: integrating risks, benefits, and patient experiences in the new era of molecular imagingR01CA281959 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Stuart Leapman · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
FDA HHS U01 FD005938NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R01 CA281959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has shown improved sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional imaging for the detection of biochemical recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer, the long-term outcomes of a widespread shift in imaging are unknown. Objective: To estimate long-term outcomes of integrating PSMA-PET into the staging pathway for recurrent prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytic modeling study simulated outcomes for patients with BCR following initial definitive local therapy. Inputs used were from the literature and a retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 institutions. The base case analysis assumed modest benefits of earlier detection and treatment, and scenario analyses considered prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at imaging and different outcomes of earlier vs delayed treatment. The analysis was performed between April 1, 2023, and May 1, 2024. Exposures: (1) Immediate PSMA-PET imaging, (2) conventional imaging (computed tomography and bone scan [CTBS]) followed by PSMA-PET if CTBS findings were negative or equivocal, and (3) CTBS alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were detection of metastases, deaths from prostate cancer, and life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Results: The model estimated that per 1000 simulated patients with BCR (assumed median age, 66 years), PSMA-PET is expected to diagnose 611 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 565-656) patients with metastasis compared with 630 (95% UI, 586-675) patients diagnosed using CTBS followed by PSMA-PET and 297 (95% UI, 202-410) patients diagnosed using CTBS alone. Moreover, the estimated number of prostate cancer deaths was 512 (95% UI, 472-552 deaths) with PSMA-PET, 520 (95% UI, 480-559 deaths) with CTBS followed by PSMA-PET, and 587 (95% UI, 538-632 deaths) with CTBS alone. Imaging with PSMA-PET yielded the highest number of QALYs, which were 824 (95% UI, 698-885) higher than CTBS. These results differed by PSA level at the time of testing, with the highest incremental life-years and QALYs and lowest number of deaths from prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of at least 5.0 ng/mL. Finally, the estimates were sensitive to the expected benefit of initiating therapy for recurrent prostate cancer earlier in the disease course. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this decision-analytic model suggest that upfront PSMA-PET imaging for the evaluation of BCR is expected to be associated with reduced cancer mortality and gains in life-years and QALYs compared with the conventional imaging strategy, assuming modest benefits of earlier detection and treatment.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39441595
PMCPMC11581571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.