Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441581›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Semi-Automated Analysis of Dome-Shaped Macula in Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Handheld Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Joshua N Dang, Jolan Wu, Yujiao Zheng, Jason J Bunk, Emily K Tam, Karen E Lee, Sumner E Lawson, Tatiana R Monger, Alex T Legocki, John P Kelly and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Visual and refractive outcomes up to 5 years of age of dome-shaped macula detected by handheld spectral domain optical coherence tomography in preterm infants.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joshua N DangCalifornia University of Science and Medicine School of Medicine, Colton, California, United States.
Jolan WuDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Yujiao ZhengDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Jason J BunkDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Emily K TamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mary Bridge Children's Hospital, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
Karen E LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Sumner E LawsonUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Tatiana R MongerDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Alex T LegockiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
John P KellyDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Obiageri EgeoluDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Leona DingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Kristina Tarczy-HornochDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Michelle T CabreraDivision of Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Funding

Characterization of Ocular Neural Stem CellsR01EY013000 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI AHMAD, IQBAL · 2001 to 2004
$919k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Dome-shaped macula (DSM) is known to occur in highly myopic adults and, recently, preterm infants. This study uses investigational handheld swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) to further characterize infantile DSM. Methods: In this prospective, observational study, preterm infants undergoing retinopathy of prematurity screening and full-term infants within 72 hours of birth were imaged. Two trained graders assessed macular features, including DSM, subretinal fluid, and macular edema. A semi-automated program measured foveal immaturity, dome height, and diameter. Results: Two hundred seventeen imaging sessions from 50 full-term and 30 preterm infants were included (46% female, preterm birth weight 1038 ± 335 g, and gestational age 28.7 ± 3.1 weeks). DSM occurred in 40% preterm versus 14% full-term infants (P = 0.01). Mean postmenstrual age at first DSM diagnosis was 38.4 ± 0.0 weeks among preterm and 40.4 ± 1.1 weeks among full-term infants (P < 0.001). Dome height and diameter measured 55.67 ± 44.22 µm and 3583.15 ± 1090.35 µm for preterm versus 88.37 ± 44.73 µm and 3581.97 ± 355.07 µm for full-term infants (P = 0.24 and P = 0.96, respectively). All 27 images (11 preterm and 7 full-term infants) with 3-dimensional analysis had round dome configuration. No other associations were seen, including macular fluid (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Infants frequently exhibit DSM without an association with macular fluid. Preterm infants were more likely than full-term infants to have DSM. Unlike DSM in children and adults, infantile DSM configuration is mostly round rather than ridge-shaped.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeInfant, PrematureMacula LuteaRetinopathy of PrematurityTomography, Optical CoherenceFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMacular EdemaMaleProspective StudiesTerm Birth

Identifiers

PMID39441581
PMCPMC11512579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.