ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Impact of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Peripheral Refraction.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status of vision and refractive errors among children and adolescents in northeast Sichuan, China: a school-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Investigate genetic and environmental influences on refractive errors in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. Methods: We assessed foveal and peripheral refractions in 54 MZ and 46 DZ twins, capturing three scans across the retina. The study focused on spherical equivalent (M) at the fovea (MLOS) and changes in midperipheral (δMmid-periphery), and peripheral (δMperiphery) defocus, along with nasal-temporal asymmetry (root mean squared error [RMSEASY]) and image shell contour (RMSEAVG). Genetic and environmental contributions were analyzed using structural equation models. Results: No significant differences were observed between MZ and DZ twins for the examined variables. Intraclass correlations (ICC) indicated an important difference in genetic influence between MLOS, with the MZ twin pairs showing a higher correlation (0.83) than DZ (0.69) pairs, and δMperiphery, because the ICC for the MZ doubled (0.87) that of the DZ (0.42) pairs. Heritability estimates from the ACE model confirmed the large difference on genetic factors' influence on the variance for MLOS (0.13) and δMperiphery (0.77) change in refractive error. RMSEASY and RMSEAVG metrics showed significant genetic impact, particularly pronounced in the peripheral measurements, revealing high genetic control. Conclusions: The study delineates a marked environmental impact on central refractive errors, whereas genetic factors had a more significant influence on peripheral refractive variance and retinal image traits. Findings of the ACE model highlight the intricate genetic and environmental interplay in refractive error development, with a notable genetic dominance in peripheral vision characteristics. This suggests potential genetic targets for interventions in myopia management and emphasizes the need for personalized approaches based on genetic predispositions. Translational Relevance: Understanding the impact of genetics and environment on peripheral refraction is essential for deepening our fundamental knowledge of myopia and guiding the development of advanced myopia control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.