ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing in a general practice 2009-2019.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary healthcare-friendly prostate cancer prediction model using routine clinical parameters: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not recommended as a population screening measure for prostate cancer. PSA testing is nevertheless widespread and is associated with harm due to false-positive test results, overdiagnosis and economic costs.
aimsThis study sought to document the exposure of patients to PSA testing over a decade in a general medical practice setting.
methodsLaboratory results for each year were extracted from the clinical record. A chart review was undertaken for cases of prostate cancer.
resultsWe report 13,743 PSA results in 3313 men. In any year, 18% of all men and 33% of men aged over 50 years had at least one PSA test. Between 4.8 and 21% of first tests exceeded age normal values depending on age. There were 113 incident cancers in the study interval of which 84 (74%) were screen detected. Mortality was lower in screen-detected than symptomatic cancers.
conclusionsMen at our practice are significantly exposed to PSA testing. We found evidence of possible overdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39441509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.