ArticleGeroScience2025
Identifying modifiable factors and their joint effect on frailty: a large population-based prospective cohort study.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut Microbiome as a Mechanistic Link Between the Planetary Health Diet and Healthy Aging.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Australian Consensus Statement on the Prevention and Management of Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Modified Delphi Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- The role of social isolation in the association between childhood friendships and frailty in older adults: evidence from a national cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Trends and lifestyle contributions to frailty in US adults aged 50 and older: analysis of health and retirement study data (2004-2020).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A thorough understanding and identification of potential determinants leading to frailty are imperative for the development of targeted interventions aimed at its prevention or mitigation. We investigated the potential determinants of frailty in a cohort of 469,301 UK Biobank participants. The evaluation of frailty was performed using the Fried index, which encompasses measurements of handgrip strength, gait speed, levels of physical activity, unintentional weight loss, and self-reported exhaustion. EWAS including 276 factors were first conducted. Factors associated with frailty in EWAS were further combined to generate composite scores for different domains, and joint associations with frailty were evaluated in a multivariate logistic model. The potential impact on frailty when eliminating unfavorable profiles of risk domains was evaluated by PAFs. A total of 21,020 (4.4%) participants were considered frailty, 192,183 (41.0%) pre-frailty, and 256,098 (54.6%) robust. The largest EWAS identified 90 modifiable factors for frailty across ten domains, each of which independently increased the risk of frailty. Among these factors, 67 have the potential to negatively impact health, while 23 have been found to have a protective effect. When shifting all unfavorable profiles to intermediate and favorable ones, overall adjusted PAF for potentially modifiable frailty risk factors was 85.9%, which increases to 86.6% if all factors are transformed into favorable tertiles. Health and medical history, psychosocial factors, and physical activity were the most significant contributors, accounting for 11.9%, 10.4%, and 10.1% respectively. This study offers valuable insights for developing population-level strategies aimed at preventing frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.