ArticleSurgical case reports2024
Lobar graft evaluation in cadaveric lobar lung redo transplantation after living-donor lobar lung transplantation: a case report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung transplantation is a vital option for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, it faces a significant challenge due to the shortage of compatible donors, which particularly affects individuals with small chest cavities and pediatric patients. The novel approach of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation is a promising solution to alleviate the donor shortage crisis. Both the mid-term and long-term outcomes of lobar lung transplantation are comparable to those of standard lung transplantation. However, patients undergoing lobar lung transplantation reported a significantly higher rate of primary graft dysfunction compared to patients undergoing standard lung transplantation. Therefore, careful donor selection is critical to improve outcomes after lobar transplantation. However, no established method exists to evaluate each lung lobar graft of deceased donors. This case report describes a case of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation to overcome size mismatch and donor shortage, with particular emphasis on lobar graft evaluation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old woman with scleroderma-related respiratory failure was listed for deceased donor lung transplantation due to a rapidly progressing disease. Faced with a long waiting list and impending mortality, she underwent bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation donated by her relatives. Post-transplant complications included progressive pulmonary vein obstruction and pleural effusion, which ultimately required retransplantation. An oversized donor with pneumonia in the bilateral lower lobes was allocated. Lung ultrasound was used to evaluate each lung lobar graft during procurement. The right upper and middle lobes and left upper lobe were confirmed to be transplantable, and lobar lung redo transplantation was performed. The patient's post-transplant course was uneventful, and she was discharged home and returned to her daily activities.
conclusionsThis case highlights the clinical impact of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation as a feasible and effective strategy to overcome the shortage of donor lungs, especially in patients with small thoracic cavities. By establishing donor lung evaluation techniques and overcoming anatomical and logistical challenges, cadaveric lobar lung transplantation can significantly expand the donor pool and offer hope to those previously considered ineligible for transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.