ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Integrating standard epilepsy protocol, ASL-perfusion, MP2RAGE/EDGE and the MELD-FCD classifier in the detection of subtle epileptogenic lesions: a 3 Tesla MRI pilot study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based detection of focal cortical dysplasia in children: External validation of the MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet pipelines.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Arterial spin labeling performs comparably to 2-[Epilepsia · 2026Article
- AI in epilepsy neuroimaging.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Advanced neuroimaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: state of the art and future perspectives.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Multimodal quantitative analysis guides precise preoperative localization of epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalformations of cortical development (MCDs) in children with focal epilepsy pose significant diagnostic challenges, and a precise radiological diagnosis is crucial for surgical planning. New MRI sequences and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are considered very promising in this regard, yet studies evaluating the relative contribution of each diagnostic technique are lacking.
methodsThe study was conducted using a dedicated "EPI-MCD MR protocol" with a 3 Tesla MRI scanner in patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative MRI. MRI sequences evaluated included 3D FLAIR, 3D T1 MPRAGE, T2 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE), 3D T1 MP2RAGE, and Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL). Two paediatric neuroradiologists scored each sequence for localisation and extension of the lesion. The MELD-FCD AI classifier's performance in identifying pathological findings was also assessed. We only included patients where a diagnosis of MCD was subsequently confirmed on histology and/or sEEG.
resultsThe 3D FLAIR sequence showed the highest yield in detecting epileptogenic lesions, with 3D T1 MPRAGE, T2 TSE, and 3D T1 MP2RAGE sequences showing moderate to low yield. ASL was the least useful. The MELD-FCD classifier achieved a 69.2% true positive rate. In one case, MELD identified a subtle area of cortical dysplasia overlooked by the neuroradiologists, changing the management of the patient.
conclusionsThe 3D FLAIR sequence is the most effective in the MRI-based diagnosis of subtle epileptogenic lesions, outperforming other sequences in localisation and extension. This pilot study emphasizes the importance of careful assessment of the value of additional sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39441414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.