Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441391›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Deep learning super-resolution reconstruction for fast and high-quality cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Dmitrij Kravchenko, Alexander Isaak, Narine Mesropyan, Johannes M Peeters, Daniel Kuetting, Claus C Pieper, Christoph Katemann, Ulrike Attenberger, Tilman Emrich, Akos Varga-Szemes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography: An analysis examining risk reclassification by left ventricular ejection fraction and cost burden analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  15. Clinical feasibility of two cardiac deep learning cine magnetic resonance imaging sequences: Single-breath-hold and free-breathing motion-corrected approaches.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  16. Ultrafast deep learning super-resolution single-shot T2-weighted imaging for robust edema visualization in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dmitrij KravchenkoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander IsaakDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Narine MesropyanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes M PeetersPhilips MR Clinical Science, Best, Netherlands.
Daniel KuettingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Claus C PieperDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph KatemannPhilips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrike AttenbergerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tilman EmrichDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Akos Varga-SzemesDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Julian A LuetkensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. julian.luetkens@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-4636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare standard-resolution balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine images with cine images acquired at low resolution but reconstructed with a deep learning (DL) super-resolution algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsCine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) datasets (short-axis and 4-chamber views) were prospectively acquired in healthy volunteers and patients at normal (cine

resultsThirty participants were analyzed (37 ± 16 years; 20 healthy volunteers and 10 patients). Short-axis views whole-stack acquisition duration of cine

conclusionDeep-learning reconstruction of cine images acquired at a lower spatial resolution led to a decrease in acquisition times of 42% with shorter breath-holds without affecting volumetric results or image quality. KEY POINTS: Question Cine CMR acquisitions are time-intensive and vulnerable to artifacts. Findings Low-resolution upscaled reconstructions using DL super-resolution decreased acquisition times by 35-42% without a significant difference in volumetric results or subjective image quality. Clinical relevance DL super-resolution reconstructions of bSSFP cine images acquired at a lower spatial resolution reduce acquisition times while preserving diagnostic accuracy, improving the clinical feasibility of cine imaging by decreasing breath hold duration.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioArtificial intelligence (AI)CardiovascularMagnetic resonance imaging (cine)

Identifiers

PMID39441391
PMCPMC12021735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.