ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Algorithms in acetabular fracture classifications.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acetabular fractures are still challenging fractures. Fracture classification is the basis for understanding these injuries and to gain treatment and to choose a fracture type-based treatment concept. Using a systematic step-wise concept of fracture analysis, based on specific radiographic lines on standard X-rays allow even less experienced surgeons to get a correct classification of the elementary and associated fracture types of Letournel's classification. Algorithmic analysis of the iliopectineal line, (anterior column involvement), ilioischial line (posterior column involvement), presence of a posterior wall fragment, fracture lines involving the iliac wing and inferior ramus, and the spur sign (representing associated both column fractures) allow for approximately 80-90% correct classifications using standard X-rays when integrating these lines into an algorithm. Especially, T-shaped fractures, ABC and ACPHT fractures may be difficult to classify. Thus, advanced imaging, such as CT scans with multiplanar reconstruction and 3D reconstructions is additionally recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.