Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441345›Full record

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 8-year results from the ACHIEVE study.

Victor J M Zeijen, Sebastian Völz, Thomas Zeller, Felix Mahfoud, Michael Kunz, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Bert Andersson, Tobias Graf, Horst Sievert, Philipp Kahlert and 4 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Kidney Denervation: Latest Breakthroughs and Insights.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Victor J M ZeijenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastian VölzDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Thomas ZellerDepartment of Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Felix MahfoudClinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Michael KunzClinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz KuckDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Bert AnderssonDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tobias GrafDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Horst SievertCardiovascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Philipp KahlertDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Clinic Essen, West-German Heart and Vascular Center, Essen, Germany.
Meital Horesh-BarReCor Medical Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Mattie J LenzenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabella KardysDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound renal sympathetic denervation (uRDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in the absence and presence of antihypertensive treatment at 2 months. Beyond 3 years, there is a lack of follow-up data. This study investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of uRDN.

methodsThis prospective observational study recruited patients previously included in the international multicenter ACHIEVE study, with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mmHg, 24 h ambulatory SBP ≥130 mmHg, ≥3 antihypertensive drugs and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≥45 ml/min/1.73m

resultsA total of 27 out of the initially enrolled 96 patients underwent prospective follow-up at a median of 8.2 [7.6-8.9] years. Mean age was 62.6±9.3 years (37.0% female). Preprocedural 24 h ambulatory BP was 151.9/84.1±11.5/11.1 mmHg and the median number of DDDs was 5.0 [4.3-7.0]. At 8 years after uRDN, the change in 24 h ambulatory SBP was -19.5 [95%CI -26.7,-12.4] mmHg (p<0.001). The 8-year change in the number of DDDs was -1.7 [-2.8,-0.6] (p = 0.003). The 8-year decline in eGFR was -8.9 [-13.2,-4.7] ml/min/1.73m

conclusionsA significant BP reduction was observed up until 8 years following uRDN in parallel to a decrease in drug burden over time, in the absence of procedure-related adverse events.

Indexed as

Blood PressureEndovascular ProceduresHypertensionKidneyRenal ArterySympathectomyAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDrug ResistanceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsAmbulatoryAntihypertensive agentsBlood pressure monitoringGlomerular Filtration RateHypertensionRenal arterySympathectomy

Identifiers

PMID39441345
PMCPMC13346321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.