Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2024
The Feasibility of Using an Intravaginal Intra-Abdominal Pressure Sensor During Running to Evaluate Pelvic Floor Loading and Its Association with Running-Induced Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Posterior Urethrovesical Angle in Continent and Incontinent Women Before and After a Treadmill Run.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Measurement and Interpretation of Intra-Abdominal Pressure During Physical Activity: A Scoping Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Optimizing women's health: pelvic floor considerations in sports and physical activity.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Is pelvic floor loading in female runners associated with post-run changes in pelvic floor morphometry or function?BJU international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim was to investigate the feasibility of using an intravaginal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) sensor worn by female runners during running to evaluate pelvic floor loading, and the association between IAP and running-induced stress urinary incontinence (RI-SUI).
methodsTwenty-eight female runners participated in this cross-sectional study (15 with RI-SUI and 13 continent). Participants completed a 37-min treadmill running protocol instrumented with an intravaginal sensor measuring IAP, and a skin-mounted accelerometer measuring pelvic accelerations. Linear regression analyses evaluated the relationship between IAP and pelvic acceleration. One-way ANOVAs assessed the impact of running speed on IAP. Sensor dislodgement was recorded, and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for the comparison of IAP and accelerometry outcomes between runners with and without RI-SUI.
resultsIntra-abdominal pressure showed high variance and the sensor was expelled in almost 15% of participants. Positive associations were found between pelvic acceleration and both absolute peak and normalized IAP but explained only between 12% and 18.6% of the variance in the models. Pelvic acceleration during running was not associated with cumulative IAP. Peak IAP significantly increased with running speed. Although IAP tended to be higher in runners with RI-SUI than in continent runners (Cohen's d between 0.14 and 0.74), pelvic accelerations tended to be lower (Cohen's d between 0.02 and 0.55).
conclusionsThere is high variance in IAP recorded during running using an intravaginal sensor. Faster speeds increase pelvic floor loading. Runners with RI-SUI may experience higher IAP than continent runners, warranting investigation. Recruitment should include a 15% data loss rate owing to sensor expulsion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39441343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.