ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2024
National Seclusion and Restraint Trends within Child Residential Treatment Facilities: 2010-2020 in Review.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Authorized Seclusion, Restraint, and Safeguards in Home and Community Based Medicaid Programs for Children With Serious Emotional Disturbance.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the percentage of child RTCs utilizing seclusion and restraint (S/R) practices and examine predictors associated with increased likelihood of S/R use between 2010 and 2020. A secondary analysis of the National Mental Health Services Survey was conducted (n-range = 580-781). Facility-level client demographics and facility characteristics were examined using multi-level logistic regression. One-way ANOVA indicated that the percentage of child RTCs using S/R significantly decreased between 2010 and 2020 [F(4, 58074) = 75.62, p <.001]. A post-hoc Bonferroni test found that the percentage of facilities reporting the use of SR in 2010 was significantly higher than in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 (all p <.001). Multi-level logistic regression analysis found that facility-level client demographics (percent male, white, and involuntarily committed) did not significantly predict facility use of SR in 2010, 2014, or 2016. However, facility-level characteristics of SED program (all p <.01), use of psychotropic medication (all p <.001), and facility size as measured by number of mental health beds (all p <.01) consistently predicted usage of SR in 2010 [F(11) = 68.38, p <.001], 2014 [F(12) = 74.25, p <.001], and 2016 [F(12) = 74.48, p <.001]. Facility ownership and accepting Medicare payments did not significantly predict facility usage of SR. Use of SR within child RTCs significantly declined between 2010 and 2020. Larger facilities, facilities with an SED program, and facilities that used psychotropic medications with clients were more likely to use SR practices between 2010 and 2016. More high-quality, publicly available data for monitoring S/R use in mental health services within the United States is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39441320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.