ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Advancing microbial diagnostics: a universal phylogeny guided computational algorithm to find unique sequences for precise microorganism detection.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strain-Specific Loci in Bacterial Genomes: Whole-Genome Discovery, Genomic Context, and Application for Multi-Strain qPCR Monitoring.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Seqwin: ultrafast identification of signature sequences in microbial genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Seqwin: Ultrafast identification of signature sequences in microbial genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Fast detection of unique genomic regions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Systems pharmacology identifies ajugol-mediated NF-κB/caspase-3 inhibition and isoacteoside-driven p62/mTOR-mediated autophagy as key mechanisms of Rehmanniae Radix and its processed form in Alzheimer's treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequences derived from organisms sharing common evolutionary origins exhibit similarity, while unique sequences, absent in related organisms, act as good diagnostic marker candidates. However, the approach focused on identifying dissimilar regions among closely-related organisms poses challenges as it requires complex multiple sequence alignments, making computation and parsing difficult. To address this, we have developed a biologically inspired universal NAUniSeq algorithm to find the unique sequences for microorganism diagnosis by traveling through the phylogeny of life. Mapping through a phylogenetic tree ensures a low number of cross-contamination and false positives. We have downloaded complete taxonomy data from Taxadb database and sequence data from National Center for Biotechnology Information Reference Sequence Database (NCBI-Refseq) and, with the help of NetworkX, created a phylogenetic tree. Sequences were assigned over the graph nodes, k-mers were created for target and non-target nodes and search was performed over the graph using the depth first search algorithm. In a memory efficient alternative NoSQL approach, we created a collection of Refseq sequences in MongoDB database using tax-id and path of FASTA files. We queried the MongoDB collection for the target and non-target sequences. In both the approaches, we used an alignment free sliding window k-mer-based procedure that quickly compares k-mers of target and non-target sequences and returns unique sequences that are not present in the non-target. We have validated our algorithm with target nodes Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Monkeypox and generated unique sequences. This universal algorithm is a powerful tool for generating diagnostic sequences, enabling the accurate identification of microbial strains with high phylogenetic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.