ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
A prospective diagnostic model for breast cancer utilizing machine learning to examine the molecular immune infiltrate in HSPB6.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mapping breast cancer research on monoclonal antibodies: a data-driven approach using VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Advanced machine learning framework for enhancing breast cancer diagnostics through transcriptomic profiling.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-02-06Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is a significant public health issue worldwide, being the most prevalent cancer among women and a leading cause of death related to this disease. The molecular processes that propel breast cancer progression are not fully elucidated, highlighting the intricate nature of the underlying biology and its crucial impact on global health. The objective of this research was to perform bioinformatics analyses on breast cancer-related datasets to gain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms at play and to identify key genes associated with the disease.
methodsThe toolkit analyses involve techniques such as differential gene expression analysis, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Weighted Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), and Machine Learning algorithms. Furthermore, in vitro cell experiments have demonstrated the impact of HSPB6 on cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis.
resultsThe study identified multiple genes that displayed differential expression in breast cancer, notably FHL1 and HSPB6. A machine learning model was developed in this study and specifically trained for breast cancer diagnosis using these genes, achieving high precision. Furthermore, analysis of immune cell infiltration revealed an enrichment of Tregs and M2 macrophages in the treated group, showcasing its significant impact on the tumor's immunological context. A temporal analysis of breast cancer cells using single-cell RNA sequencing provided insights into cellular developmental trajectories and highlighted changes in expression patterns across key genes during disease progression. The upregulation of HSPB6 in MCF7 cells significantly inhibited both cell migration and proliferation abilities, suggesting that promoting HSPB6 expression could induce ferroptosis in breast cancer cells.
conclusionOur findings have identified compelling molecular targets and distinctive diagnostic markers for the clinical management of breast cancer. This data will serve as crucial guidance for further research in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.