ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Single-cell omics and machine learning integration to develop a polyamine metabolism-based risk score model in breast cancer patients.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics identification of a polyamine metabolism related signature for hepatocellular carcinoma and revealing tumor microenvironment characteristics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Identification of potential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma based on machine learning and bioinformatics analysis.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-02-06Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Rogue Editor · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer remains the leading malignant neoplasm among women globally, posing significant challenges in terms of treatment and prognostic evaluation. The metabolic pathway of polyamines is crucial in breast cancer progression, with a strong association to the increased capabilities of tumor cells for proliferation, invasion, and metastasis.
methodsWe used a multi-omics approach combining bulk RNA sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to study polyamine metabolism. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, and Genotype-Tissue Expression identified 286 differentially expressed genes linked to polyamine pathways in breast cancer. These genes were analyzed using univariate COX and machine learning algorithms to develop a prognostic scoring algorithm. Single-cell RNA sequencing validated the model by examining gene expression heterogeneity at the cellular level.
resultsOur single-cell analyses revealed distinct subpopulations with different expressions of genes related to polyamine metabolism, highlighting the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. The SuperPC model (a constructed risk score) demonstrated high accuracy when predicting patient outcomes. The immune profiling and functional enrichment analyses revealed that the genes identified play a crucial role in cell cycle control and immune modulation. Single-cell validation confirmed that polyamine metabolism genes were present in specific cell clusters. This highlights their potential as therapeutic targets.
conclusionsThis study integrates single cell omics with machine-learning to develop a robust scoring model for breast cancer based on polyamine metabolic pathways. Our findings offer new insights into tumor heterogeneity, and a novel framework to personalize prognosis. Single-cell technologies are being used in this context to enhance our understanding of the complex molecular terrain of breast cancer and support more effective clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.