Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441204›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Accelerating Evidence Synthesis in Observational Studies: Development of a Living Natural Language Processing-Assisted Intelligent Systematic Literature Review System.

Frank J Manion, Jingcheng Du, Dong Wang, Long He, Bin Lin, Jingqi Wang, Siwei Wang, David Eckels, Jan Cervenka, Peter C Fiduccia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Frank J ManionIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-6348
Jingcheng DuIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-4566
Dong WangMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0009-0003-3322-6284
Long HeIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.
Bin LinIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.
Jingqi WangIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-4574-1448
Siwei WangIMO Health, 9600 W Bryn Mawr Ave # 100, Rosemont, IL, 60018, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-3323-4803
David EckelsMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0009-0006-4859-0953
Jan CervenkaMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0009-0004-7341-6901
Peter C FiducciaMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0000-0001-9902-9476
Nicole CossrowMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0009-0006-4982-4547
Lixia YaoMerck & Co, Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, United States, 1 619-643-2693.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-6120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Systematic literature review (SLR), a robust method to identify and summarize evidence from published sources, is considered to be a complex, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive task. Objective: This study aimed to present a solution based on natural language processing (NLP) that accelerates and streamlines the SLR process for observational studies using real-world data. Methods: We followed an agile software development and iterative software engineering methodology to build a customized intelligent end-to-end living NLP-assisted solution for observational SLR tasks. Multiple machine learning-based NLP algorithms were adopted to automate article screening and data element extraction processes. The NLP prediction results can be further reviewed and verified by domain experts, following the human-in-the-loop design. The system integrates explainable articificial intelligence to provide evidence for NLP algorithms and add transparency to extracted literature data elements. The system was developed based on 3 existing SLR projects of observational studies, including the epidemiology studies of human papillomavirus-associated diseases, the disease burden of pneumococcal diseases, and cost-effectiveness studies on pneumococcal vaccines. Results: Our Intelligent SLR Platform covers major SLR steps, including study protocol setting, literature retrieval, abstract screening, full-text screening, data element extraction from full-text articles, results summary, and data visualization. The NLP algorithms achieved accuracy scores of 0.86-0.90 on article screening tasks (framed as text classification tasks) and macroaverage F1 scores of 0.57-0.89 on data element extraction tasks (framed as named entity recognition tasks). Conclusions: Cutting-edge NLP algorithms expedite SLR for observational studies, thus allowing scientists to have more time to focus on the quality of data and the synthesis of evidence in observational studies. Aligning the living SLR concept, the system has the potential to update literature data and enable scientists to easily stay current with the literature related to observational studies prospectively and continuously.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingObservational Studies as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSoftwareartificial intelligencedata extractiondeep learningepidemiologymachine learningnatural language processingsoftware developmentsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID39441204
PMCPMC11523763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.