ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2024
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntestinal parasitoses are very common in school and in Mauritania few external studies address the issue. Several risk factors are known for intestinal parasitosis, including fecal danger, promiscuity and contaminated food Objective: To describe the epidemiology of intestinal parasitosis in school-age children in the Moughatâa (department) of Riyadh in Nouakchott (Mauritania) and the associated risk factors.
methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study lasting three months, at the level of a random sample of pupils enrolled in five primary schools in the Moughatâa of Riyadh, as well as the foods sold in front of the establishments included. The data was collected through an anamnestic and clinical observation grid, as well as stool and food samples exposed in front of the schools included. The parasitological examination of the stools was carried out at the National Institute of Public Health Research (INRSP) in Nouakchott, by the methods of modified Ritchie and Kato-Katz. For food, a microbiological analysis looking for fecal colibacilli is carried out.
resultsThe study population was composed of 337 students with a sex ratio of 0.76. The prevalence of parasitosis in the study population was 46% (95% CI [40.75%-51.33%]): Boys (48.6%), 95% CI [40.66%-56.67%]); Girls (43.9%), 95% CI [37.13%-51.07%]. The spectrum of these parasitic intestinal diseases was dominated by protozoa (51.6%) and helminthiasis represented 10.4% and characterized by mono parasitism (31.8%). The food sold in front of the schools studied was contaminated with coli bacteria, in 54.5% of cases.
conclusionThe high prevalence of intestinal parasitosis in the primary schools studied and the contamination of food sold to students, require the strengthening of the strategy to fight against diseases of fecal peril and school and public hygiene, in the Moughatâa of Riyadh (Nouakchott).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.