Trial reportLa Tunisie medicale2024
Trial report in La Tunisie medicale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAudiovisual distraction (AVD) is one of the non-pharmacological means of anxiety prevention. However, few studies have evaluated its perioperative effect in adults.
aimTo evaluate the contribution of audio-visual distraction in the prevention of perioperative anxiety in adult patients proposed for surgery under spinal anesthesia.
methodsThis was a prospective randomized controlled study lasting three months from July 1, 2021. We included ASA I to III over 18 years patients, proposed for visceral or orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We didn't include patients operated in lateral or prone positions or with a history of anxiety disorders or communication difficulties. 90 patients were randomized into two groups: a control group T and a group A who had an AVD throughout the operation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS).
resultsDemographic characteristics, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) and pain levels were comparable between the two groups. During the surgery, 22 (48.9 %) patients in group T versus 3 (6.7 %) in group A required Midazolam (p < 0.001). Anxiety assessed by VAS at the end of the act was lower in group A (p < 0.001). The pain levels also were lower in patients who received AVD (p = 0.004). A patient satisfaction score (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale French version) ≥ 5.4 was more frequently observed in group A (p < 0.001).
conclusionAVD reduced perioperative anxiety and decreased the use of midazolam during surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.