Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39440931›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Viability discrimination of bacterial microbiomes in home kitchen dish sponges using propidium monoazide treatment.

Christina K Carstens, Joelle K Salazar, Shreela Sharma, Wenyaw Chan, Charles Darkoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina K CarstensDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Joelle K SalazarDivision of Food Processing Science and Technology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Bedford Park, Illinois, USA.
Shreela SharmaDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Wenyaw ChanDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Charles DarkohDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-7856

Funding

Characterizing Vancomycin-Resistant C. difficile Strains at Two Geographically Distinct LocationsR01AI150685 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DARKOH, CHARLES · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Targeting the Toxins: A Novel Non-Antimicrobial Approach to Combat Clostridium difficile infectionsR01AI116914 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DARKOH, CHARLES · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI150685NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116914NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dish sponges are known to support the proliferation of human bacterial pathogens, yet they are commonly used by consumers. Exposure to foodborne pathogens via sponge use may lead to illness, a serious concern among susceptible populations. The extent of exposure risks from sponge use has been limited by constraints associated with culture-independent or dependent methods for bacterial community characterization. Therefore, five used dish sponges were characterized to evaluate the presence of viable bacterial foodborne pathogens using the novel application of propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment and targeted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Select pathogen viability was confirmed using targeted selective enrichment. The taxonomic abundance profiles of total and viable sponge microbiomes did not vary significantly. The numbers of unique bacterial species (p = 0.0465) and foodborne pathogens (p = 0.0102) identified were significantly lower in viable sponge microbiomes. Twenty unique bacterial foodborne pathogens were detected across total and viable sponge microbiomes, and three to six viable foodborne pathogens were identified in each sponge. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were identified in each viable sponge microbiome, and viable E. coli were recovered from two sponges via targeted selective enrichment. These findings suggest that sponge-associated bacterial communities are primarily viable and contain multiple viable bacterial foodborne pathogens.

Indexed as

AzidesBacteriaMicrobial ViabilityMicrobiotaPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialFood MicrobiologyHousehold ArticlesHumansAzidesDNA, BacterialPropidiumpropidium monoazideRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39440931
PMCPMC11497490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.