ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024
How do high phosphate concentrations affect soil microbial communities after a century of ecosystem self-reclamation?
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How do high phosphate concentrations affect soil microbial communities after a century of ecosystem self-reclamation?Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of rock phosphate (RP) instead of soluble phosphate fertilizers is preferred for the development of more sustainable agriculture. However, the impact of high concentrations in RP on bacterial and fungal communities remains poorly documented. Thus, next-generation sequencing was used to characterize bacterial and fungal communities in the soils and roots of four plant species growing naturally in a self-restored ecosystem, on former open-pit phosphate mines where past exploitation generated locally a substantial phosphate enrichment of the soil. Our results show that bacterial communities are dominated by Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria phyla, while the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota phyla predominate in the fungal community. The alpha and beta diversities of both bacterial and fungal communities differ significantly between the root and soil compartments but are not significantly affected by RP inputs. However, Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) indicative of RP-enriched soils have been identified; among them are bacteria representative of Streptomyces, Bacillus, Mycobacterium or Agromyces. Implications of these results open new ways of reflection to understand the microbial response following RP-inputs and long-term soil restoration, as well as to formulate microbial-based bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture applications based on microorganisms better adapted to high concentrations of RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.