Trial reportHead & neck2025
Long-Term Outcomes of Dysphagia Rehabilitation With an Adjustable Resistance Training Device in Laryngectomized Individuals.
Trial report in Head & neck, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of post-laryngectomy dysphagia rehabilitation using High-Resolution impedance manometry: an exploratory study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Trial
- Management of dysphagia in head and neck cancer: current and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Tracheoesophageal Voicing Following Resistance-Based Dysphagia Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Multidimensional Assessment.Head & neck · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated long-term outcomes of dysphagia rehabilitation with an adjustable resistance training device (Swallowing Exercise Aid, SEA2.0) in laryngectomized individuals.
methodsSeventeen laryngectomized participants who participated in a Clinical Phase II Trial were reevaluated at T3 (approximately 6 months after T2), including an interview, PROMS, oral intake, and swallowing capacity. Results of T3 were compared with the earlier time points T0 (baseline), T1 (after 6 weeks of training), and T2 (after 8 weeks of rest).
resultsAll outcomes at T3 remained improved compared to T0. Compared to findings at T2, participants reported some deterioration in swallowing at T3. Swallowing capacity and oral intake slightly decreased. Swallowing-related quality of life slightly improved.
conclusionsBenefits of swallowing rehabilitation with the SEA2.0 in laryngectomized individuals are still noticeable long term. The need for continued exercising to fully maintain improved function is likely, but the required intensity and extent should be determined in further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.