Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39440477›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2024

Implementing the optimized hippo-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited-stage small cell lung cancer by tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Tian-You Zhan, Lei Deng, Wen-Qing Wang, Tao Zhang, Jian-Yang Wang, Xin Wang, Wen-Yang Liu, Yi-Rui Zhai, Ze-Fen Xiao, Qin-Fu Feng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tian-You ZhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3933-5683
Lei DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Wen-Qing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-0679
Jian-Yang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Wen-Yang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Yi-Rui ZhaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Ze-Fen XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Qin-Fu FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Nan BiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Ye-Xiong LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Zong-Mei ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8336-2319

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2020-I2M-C&T-B-076National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020AAA0109504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHippo-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) requires a hippocampal avoidance zone expanded from hippocampus to ensure dose fall-off and compensate for setup errors. Most studies recommend a 5-mm margin, while it could be optimized to a 2-mm expansion. Here, we showed the details of optimized HA-PCI for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

methodsThis cohort study reviewed patients with LS-SCLC receiving optimized HA-PCI from August 2014 to June 2020 in the National Cancer Center of China. The hippo-related dose parameters were summarized. The comparison of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) scores in different time points was conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.

resultsA total of 112 patients were included. The average doses of hippocampus and hippocampal avoidance zone were 6.80 Gy (IQR: 6.40-7.44) and 7.63 Gy (IQR: 7.14-8.39). No differences were observed in the two radiation techniques (tomotherapy [TOMO] vs. volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT]). The decline of HVLT-R score remained in a low level and not significant in assessable patients (p = 0.095). With a median follow-up of 52 months (95% CI: 47.2-56.7), the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 74.1% and 50.0%, respectively. Two intracranial recurrence lesions (2.3%) located <2 mm from the hippocampus.

conclusionsOptimized HA-PCI could achieve similar dose limitation by TOMO and VMAT techniques with favorable efficacy and minor toxicity.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studieshippocampal avoidance zoneprophylactic cranial irradiationsmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID39440477
PMCPMC11609051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.