ReviewJournal of cell science2024
Making the most of bioimaging data through interdisciplinary interactions.
Review in Journal of cell science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging annotated microscopy imaging data and analysis method development for scientific discovery.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DNAzyme-Based Nanostructures for Dynamic Cell Regulation and Sensing.ChemistryOpen · 2026Review
- MIFA: Metadata, Incentives, Formats and Accessibility guidelines to improve the reuse of AI datasets for bioimage analysis.Nature methods · 2025Review
- The importance of democratized resources in early-career training for bioimage analysts and bioimaging scientists.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing technical complexity of all aspects involving bioimages, ranging from their acquisition to their analysis, has led to a diversification in the expertise of scientists engaged at the different stages of the discovery process. Although this diversity of profiles comes with the major challenge of establishing fruitful interdisciplinary collaboration, such collaboration also offers a superb opportunity for scientific discovery. In this Perspective, we review the different actors within the bioimaging research universe and identify the primary obstacles that hinder their interactions. We advocate that data sharing, which lies at the heart of innovation, is finally within reach after decades of being viewed as next to impossible in bioimaging. Building on recent community efforts, we propose actions to consolidate the development of a truly interdisciplinary bioimaging culture based on open data exchange and highlight the promising outlook of bioimaging as an example of multidisciplinary scientific endeavour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.