ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025
Planetary Health in Nursing: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Planetary health in practice: A scoping review of education and training for nurses and midwives.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- The Dutch-translated Climate and Health Tool for nurses: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Centring Biodiversity in Nursing for Decolonial Planetary Health.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
- Nursing education for climate change: historical milestones and pedagogical axes for curricular integration.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Article
- Promotion of planetary health through climate-sensitive health counselling in occupational therapy-a qualitative interview study in three countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Role of Lifestyle Nursing in Promoting Planetary Health: A Scoping Review Protocol.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Nursing Science and Environmental Determinants of Health: A Call for Environmental Health Nurse Scientists and Educators.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo map the extent of the use of the term 'planetary health' in peer-reviewed nursing literature.
designScoping Review. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Premium, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses and Web of Science were searched in January and February 2024 for English and French-language publications. A follow-up search was conducted on 10 June 2024 to determine if additional literature was published. REVIEW
methodsA scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology for scoping reviews. To be included the article had to explicitly use the term 'planetary health' and 'nursing' or 'nurses'.
resultsSixty-eight articles met the criteria for the scoping review and were included in this review, with the majority published between 2017 and 2024. Predominant literature included discussion papers, commentaries and editorials. A lack of original research is apparent. Most of the publications were calls to action for nurses to advance planetary health in nursing education, practice, research and advocacy work.
conclusionsLiterature confirms that planetary health is a recent and an important topic in nursing, and nurses have a well-documented role to play in planetary health, given the numerous calls to action in nursing leadership, education, practice and research. There is a need to publish the essential work nurses are doing in planetary health in various nursing domains. IMPACT: This scoping review revealed a clear and urgent call to action for nurses to address planetary health. Given this finding, nurses have a responsibility to advocate for a planetary health approach in the profession and take action to contribute to planetary health through education, research, practice and advocacy. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable, as no patients or public were involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.