SynthesisRenal failure2024
Effectiveness and safety of B cell-targeting biologics in the treatment of lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta‑analysis.
Synthesis in Renal failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rituximab as Rescue or Add-On Therapy for Relapsing or Refractory Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in refractory membranous nephropathy: a single-arm meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Peritoneal dialysis in lupus nephritis: comparative outcomes vs. hemodialysis, risk stratification, and modality selection framework.Renal failure · 2026Review
- The Evolution of Lupus Nephritis Therapy from the 1960s to the Present.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evolution of idiopathic membranous nephropathy to class v lupus nephritis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: successful treatment with caplacizumab and rituximab.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different B cell-targeting biological agents combining with standard of care in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).
methodsComprehensive literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Central in the Cochran Library, spanning from inception to May 20th, 2024. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing rituximab (RTX), belimumab, ocrelizumab, obinutuzumab, and anifrolumab in LN were selected. The primary outcomes of interest were related to complete renal remission (CRR), and partial renal remission (PRR). Additionally, we delved into safety outcomes, examining the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs), infections, and the discontinuation rates due to adverse events.
resultsA total of 6 RCTs with 1150 patients applying various B cell-targeting biological agents were included. Notably, ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that obinutuzumab (SUCRA 85.2%) has the highest potential superiority in improving CRR, followed by belimumab, ocrelizumab. Regarding the improvement in PRR, obinutuzumab (SUCRA 83.0%) has the highest potential superiority. In terms of safety, with a focus on SAEs, infections, and the discontinuation rates due to adverse events, the results were: SUCRA-based ranking indicated that RTX (SUCRA 74.1%) had the highest probability of postponing SAEs, followed by belimumab and obinutuzumab. Concerning infection reduction, anifrolumab (SUCRA 78.7%) had the highest potential superiority. Safety events monitoring infection occurred better with RTX than with standard therapy (OR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.02, 12.66) and were statistically different. For the discontinuation rates due to adverse events, RTX (SUCRA 88.6%) demonstrated the highest potential superiority.
conclusionsConcerning the effectiveness and safety outcomes, obinutuzumab, belimumab, and RTX plus standard of care may be superior to the current standard therapy as treatments for LN. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, with a registration number of CRD42024548522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.